I use Acronis True Image exclusively in my household and have for well over a decade, long before they started naming their versions by year.
2014 on my main machine, 2015 on my wife's machine and the latest 2016 on my testbed machine running the latest preview build. I can't say that I like the interface since they changed it in 2015. They believed, I suspect, that if they dumbed it down, it might increase their sales. All the bits are still there, they just made it muppet proof so practically anyone can at least get a backup on hand.
I like it because after creating an image I can mount it from within the software and browse it just like any other drive on my computer. Play a music file, open a photograph, read a book, etc..... and confirm that the backup is what I expected and viable. Additionally the bootable rescue media is a life saver especially on my testbed computer where I bounce around a bit between builds and experiment fearlessly with various configuration settings.
Trust me, as a grandfather of six, who think it's a right and not a privilege to use Grandpa's and Grandma's computers whenever they visit.... If I thought there was a better way to safeguard against infection from virus, malware or ransomware, I'd certainly be employing it.
Many people sing the praises of Macrium Reflect, while others seem to like other alternatives. I listed some here
https://www.windows10forums.com/threads/please-for-your-own-peace-of-mind.794/
While still others seem to like cloud based solutions like Carbonite or CrashPlan, although they are not intended to be used in the case of a baremetal restore type scenario, they seem to be great for data backup.