There are gripes concerning the moving of control items around the gui, making it, in some cases, a little more learning experience. Much of this is centered around the start menu. I cannot comment on this. MS have tried hard to satisfy several (Too many, perhaps), sides of the argument on this. I was happy with what they called the "modern" interface, in Windows 8.1. I could reconstruct this in Windows 10, but, for the moment, I am using the built in text menu. There were so many complaints, from users wishing to return to the old text. Now there are equally as many wanting the modern screen back again ??
If you look through the feedback items in the insider program, whilst it appears to be too large to really absorb, much of it is repetiton, or requests, rather than filed bugs.
I do not use Cortana: Edge, or the Mail application. I do see a number of complaints in those areas.
Apart from that, these are the only problems I can see in forums, that are really of significance. It would be interesting, in this thread, to see who can add any important complaints or bugs they may have found, of a general nature. By that, I mean, not associated with a particular item of hardware, which may well, not be the fault of MS/Windows 10.
I am hoping our esteemed helper, Trouble , will pop in with a few to add, as his posts do indicate dissatisfaction.
This is all I see in forums, repeated over and over:
1. I am very unhappy with the update system, so are many.
2. Activation seems to be giving problems, I have not personally experienced this, after quite a few upgrades and fresh installation, on mine and other computers.
3. Complaints that the WiFi connection is intermittent. No complaints here.
4. Trivia, but complaints that the Media centre is missing - so it was in Windows 8 - What's
new!
5. The Settings have improved, but still take you to the good old Control panel in some cases. I would like to see the Control panel left in situ, but get all of those functions into the Settings.
There are, on the web, offers of hacks and reg editing, in order to deal with some of these. I do not see why a user should have the need to go to these lengths, and MS should give them top priority in the forthcoming service pack, or whatever they are going to call it.
Bottom line for me, which I have expressed from Day one, is that what we are looking at here is a slightly unpolished Windows 8.2, with a name change to hide the bad publicity of the previous OS